| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Regina Obe" <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Version 10, missing minor version |
| Date: | 2016-08-28 18:52:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1585.1472410329@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Regina Obe" <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> writes:
> The routine in PostGIS to parse out the version number from pg_config is
> breaking in the 10 cycle
TBH, I wonder why you are doing that in the first place; it does not
seem like the most reliable source of version information. If you
need to do compile-time tests, PG_CATALOG_VERSION is considered the
best thing to look at, or VERSION_NUM in Makefiles.
However, if you're dead set on getting a version number out of a string
representation, you'll need to make changes similar to commit
69dc5ae408f68c302029a6b43912a2cc16b1256c.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2016-08-28 20:23:16 | Re: RLS related docs |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2016-08-28 17:12:53 | Re: PostgreSQL Version 10, missing minor version |