| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: JDBC driver and Postgres 9.6beta |
| Date: | 2016-05-14 14:49:28 |
| Message-ID: | 24504.1463237368@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> On 14 May 2016 at 10:33, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Using pg_get_indexdef() would leave you much less vulnerable to cross-
>> version differences in the system catalogs.
> That means parsing the response..
True. If it seems like too much churn, I think you wouldn't go very far
wrong by assuming that ASC/DESC is only relevant to btree indexes.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2016-05-17 06:10:53 | Re: JDBC driver and Postgres 9.6beta |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2016-05-14 14:41:27 | Re: JDBC driver and Postgres 9.6beta |