From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Relpartbound, toasting and pg_class |
Date: | 2017-06-12 23:19:34 |
Message-ID: | 1046.1497309574@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I'm not quite sure where the aversion to adding a toast table to
> pg_class is coming from?
I'm not at all sure it would work, and would rather not introduce
risks of infinite recursion if they're not necessary.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-06-12 23:39:05 | Re: Re: BUG #14680: startup process on standby encounter a deadlock of TwoPhaseStateLock when redo 2PC xlog |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-06-12 23:17:34 | Re: Relpartbound, toasting and pg_class |