| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL Record Header Size Reduction |
| Date: | 2007-01-25 16:46:15 |
| Message-ID: | 1169743575.3772.187.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > ISTM that we would get the effect your looking for by just moving the
> > xl_tot_len field to the end, and only storing it for records with backup
> > blocks:
>
> I like that formulation better --- seems like less
> change-for-the-sake-of-change.
Will do.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2007-01-25 16:49:12 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
| Previous Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2007-01-25 16:35:25 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |