From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety |
Date: | 2021-04-23 13:15:02 |
Message-ID: | 1308811.1619183702@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm curious. The FmgrBuiltin struct includes the "strict" flag, so
> that would "lock down the value" of the strict flag, wouldn't it?
It does, but that's much more directly a property of the function's
C code than parallel-safety is.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Pyhalov | 2021-04-23 13:29:07 | Re: CTE push down |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-04-23 12:42:06 | Re: convert elog(LOG) calls to ereport |