From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql additions |
Date: | 2011-09-12 12:39:42 |
Message-ID: | 1315831182.5351.3.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On mån, 2011-09-12 at 05:26 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 09/11/2011 11:43 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Second, I'd like to be able to set a minimum number of lines below which the
> >> pager would not be used, something like:
> >>
> >> \pset pagerminlines 200
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> > Gee, why do I feel like we have something like this already?
>
> We do? We control columns, but not lines AFAIK.
We check the lines and columns in the terminal window. Oddly enough,
that code is in two separate places, so I don't know if they have
consistent effects.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-09-12 12:54:39 | Re: Patch to improve reliability of postgresql on linux nfs |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2011-09-12 10:40:11 | WIP: Collecting statistics on CSV file data |