| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers |
| Date: | 2020-09-15 23:00:37 |
| Message-ID: | 1414831.1600210837@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:02 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> The tag is applied, though for some reason the pgsql-committers auto
>> e-mail about new tags hasn't been working lately.
> Thanks. FWIW I did get the automated email shortly after you sent this email.
Yeah, it did show up here too, about an hour after I pushed the tag.
The last several taggings have been delayed similarly, and I think
at least one never was reported at all.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-09-16 00:10:27 | Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2020-09-15 22:48:32 | Re: DROP relation IF EXISTS Docs and Tests - Bug Fix |