| From: | Jim Finnerty <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)? |
| Date: | 2020-12-10 16:07:22 |
| Message-ID: | 1607616442920-0.post@n3.nabble.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
What is the current status of the 64-bit XID topic? Was an updated patch
ever posted to a different thread as suggested by Andres, or is v5 the
latest patch available? Is anyone developing a heap64 storage plugin?
I'm in the process of applying the v5 patch set just to understand what was
done, but the patches didn't all apply cleanly and so I've been doing a lot
of manual cleanup. It's a big patch set. It's obvious that a huge amount
of work and thought has gone into this.
-----
Jim Finnerty, AWS, Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL
--
Sent from: https://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2020-12-10 16:15:12 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
| Previous Message | Lukas Meisegeier | 2020-12-10 15:49:35 | Feature Proposal: Add ssltermination parameter for SNI-based LoadBalancing |