From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bharanee Rathna <deepfryed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ISO8601 vs POSIX offset clarification |
Date: | 2017-12-04 14:58:28 |
Message-ID: | 17467.1512399508@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bharanee Rathna <deepfryed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> To be more specific, I expected the output of both these queries to be the
> same.
> # select '2017-12-01 11:00:00 +11:00'::timestamp with time zone at time
> zone '+11:00';
> # select '2017-12-01 11:00:00 +11:00'::timestamp with time zone at time
> zone 'Australia/Melbourne';
The +11 in your timestamp input value is per ISO convention, but the
argument of AT TIME ZONE is a zone name, so it follows the POSIX
convention if it's numeric.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2017-12-04 15:01:36 | Re: Centos 6.9 and centos 7 |
Previous Message | Nicola Contu | 2017-12-04 14:51:53 | Re: Centos 6.9 and centos 7 |