| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com>, bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Maximum password length |
| Date: | 2020-09-01 21:58:39 |
| Message-ID: | 186436.1598997519@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> ISTM that it's only going to be a matter of time before that will be
> exceeded. Why have a limit at all? Accept whatever StringInfo accepts.
Hmm, that would require some refactoring of simple_prompt for starters.
I agree there's no hard reason why we have to have any specific limit,
if we're willing to do that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2020-09-01 22:09:14 | Re: Group by reordering optimization |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2020-09-01 21:48:07 | Re: Disk-based hash aggregate's cost model |