| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Reinitialize stack base after fork (for the benefit of rr)? |
| Date: | 2020-03-27 18:59:56 |
| Message-ID: | 19797.1585335596@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2020-03-27 14:34:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>>> Tom, while imo not a fix of the right magnitude here: Are you planning /
>>> hoping to work again on your postmaster latch patch?
>> Um ... -ESWAPPEDOUT. What are you thinking of?
> https://postgr.es/m/18193.1492793404%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Oh, I thought we'd dropped that line of thinking in favor of trying
to not do work in the postmaster signal handlers (i.e. I thought *you*
were pushing this forward, not me).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-03-27 19:04:29 | Re: error context for vacuum to include block number |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2020-03-27 18:53:10 | Re: backup manifests |