| From: | Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: dell versus hp |
| Date: | 2007-11-14 22:39:50 |
| Message-ID: | 200711141439.50418@hal.medialogik.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Jeff Frost <jeff(at)frostconsultingllc(dot)com>
wrote:
> > OK, impressive RAID-6 performance (not so impressive RAID-10
> > performance, but that could be a filesystem issue). Note to self; try
> > an Areca controller in next storage server.
>
> I believe these were both on ext3. I thought I had some XFS results
> available for comparison, but I couldn't find them.
Yeah I've seen ext3 write performance issues on RAID-10. XFS is much better.
--
Q: Why did God create economists?
A: In order to make weather forecasters look good.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-14 22:46:24 | Re: Curious about dead rows. |
| Previous Message | Jeff Frost | 2007-11-14 22:36:54 | Re: dell versus hp |