From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | "Rady, Doug" <radydoug(at)amazon(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts |
Date: | 2018-04-06 21:49:19 |
Message-ID: | 20087.1523051359@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I'm still not particularly happy with this.
I'm a bit confused as to what the point is. It seems unlikely that one
pgbench process can effectively drive enough backends for select's
limitations to really be an issue.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-04-06 21:54:01 | Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-04-06 21:48:58 | Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks |