| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: superusers are members of all roles? |
| Date: | 2011-09-12 09:55:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20110912095542.GR12765@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Andrew Dunstan (andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net) wrote:
> It's NOT changing that. All this affects is how +groupname is
> treated in pg_hba.conf, i.e. do we treat every superuser there as
> being a member of every group.
Ah, sorry for the noise, that's fine (and I'm bit suprised it was a
one-liner, guess I should go look at the patch... ;).
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2011-09-12 10:40:11 | WIP: Collecting statistics on CSV file data |
| Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2011-09-12 09:45:04 | [v9.2] "database" object class of contrib/sepgsql |