| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster |
| Date: | 2017-02-20 11:04:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20170220110456.2jupmfhxlizykmmc@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-02-20 11:58:12 +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> That being said, I did wonder myself if we should just deprecate float
> timestamps as well.
I think we need a proper deprecation period for that, given that the
conversion away will be painful for pg_upgrade using people with big
clusters. So I think we should fix this regardless... :(
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2017-02-20 11:21:58 | pg_ls_waldir() & pg_ls_logdir() |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-02-20 10:58:12 | Re: Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster |