| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, vinayak <Pokale_Vinayak_q3(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ANALYZE command progress checker |
| Date: | 2017-03-01 18:28:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20170301182823.7ug4vkyo4et3j33d@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-03-01 10:25:49 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> We now have a framework for this [1] (currently used by vacuum, but
> extensible). The question is about presentation. I'm fairly sure that
> we shouldn't just add yet another framework, and I doubt that that's
> what's proposed by Peter.
>
> [1]
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=c16dc1aca5e
Majority of that is actually in
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=b6fb6471f6afaf649e52f38269fd8c5c60647669
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-03-01 19:16:28 | Re: Logical replication existing data copy |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-03-01 18:25:49 | Re: ANALYZE command progress checker |