| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE |
| Date: | 2017-03-10 02:06:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20170310020656.fgnyxezogincj7up@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> (And no, I don't especially
> approve of RELKIND_SEQUENCE being 'S' either, but it's far too late to
> change that.)
FWIW the reason SEQUENCE uses S instead of 's' is that the latter was
taken for "special" relations, which we removed a few releases ago
(commit 3a694bb0a1).
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-03-10 02:06:59 | Re: GSOC Introduction / Eliminate O(N^2) scaling from rw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-10 02:03:15 | Re: contrib modules and relkind check |