| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mengxing Liu <liu-mx15(at)mails(dot)tsinghua(dot)edu(dot)cn>, gpapadrosou(at)gmail(dot)com, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GSOC Introduction / Eliminate O(N^2) scaling from rw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions |
| Date: | 2017-03-10 16:38:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20170310163812.GJ9812@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin,
* Kevin Grittner (kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > [two people interested in the same GSoC project]
>
> It's an interesting problem to have.
>
> If neither of you chooses to voluntarily back down, the obvious
> resolution is for the mentors to vote on the better proposal. If we
> do that early enough during the student application period, there
> might still be time for the person whose proposal wasn't chosen to
> submit a proposal for an alternative project. As I see it, that
> means:
>
> - I would tend to favor a proposal submitted on the first day
> (beginning March 20 16:00 UTC), if only one is.
>
> - I would push for very early voting by the PostgreSQL mentors.
Agreed. Many thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-03-10 16:38:30 | Re: Parallel Append implementation |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-03-10 16:36:20 | Re: Upgrading postmaster's log messages about bind/listen errors |