| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: fork()-safety, thread-safety |
| Date: | 2017-10-06 00:06:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20171006000655.gc4dmp25sawz6ed2@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-10-06 07:59:40 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> The only thing that gets me excited about a threaded postgres is the
> ability to have a PL/Java, PL/Mono etc that don't suck. We could do
> some really cool things that just aren't practical right now.
Faster parallelism with a lot less reinventing the wheel. Easier backend
/ session separation. Shared caches.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-10-06 00:15:41 | Re: fork()-safety, thread-safety |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-10-05 23:59:40 | Re: fork()-safety, thread-safety |