| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: On markers of changed data |
| Date: | 2017-10-08 15:11:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20171008151157.GK4628@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrey,
* Andrey Borodin (x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru) wrote:
> But my other question still seems unanswered: can I use LSN logic for incrementing FSM and VM? Seems like most of the time there is valid LSN
I haven't gone and audited it myself, but I would certainly expect you
to be able to use the LSN for everything which is WAL'd. If you have
cases where that's not the case, it'd be useful to see them.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adam Brusselback | 2017-10-08 15:17:01 | Re: Discussion on missing optimizations |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-10-08 13:21:03 | Re: Help required to debug pg_repack breaking logical replication |