| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add more information_schema columns |
| Date: | 2018-02-07 05:14:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20180207051442.GB1753@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:45:52PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think what I had meant to write was something like
>
> (t.tgtype & (1 | 66))
>
> but maybe it's clearer to write it all out as you did.
If you prefer that, that's fine for me as well. I tend to prefer the
formulation where both expressions are separated to make clearer that
ordering needs to be split for all three characteristics.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shay Rojansky | 2018-02-07 05:27:12 | Cached/global query plans, autopreparation |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2018-02-07 04:51:58 | Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join |