| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use |
| Date: | 2018-03-22 01:42:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20180322014220.GE2490@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 07:48:02AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I've pushed the configure tests. Let's see what they say.
At least the buildfarm is green. Browsing the buildfarm logs manually
is kind of annoying for any normal human being. I guess that you have
access to the database holding all this data, which could make that
easier to look. What are those telling about SIZEOF_BOOL in
pg_config.h?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2018-03-22 01:42:35 | Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-03-22 01:39:57 | Re: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two |