| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Mop-up for the bootstrap data conversion patch |
| Date: | 2018-04-07 12:31:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20180407123148.GA9262@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 09:25:44AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've always felt that the pg_foo_fn.h business was a kluge, and would
>> be happy to get rid of it. But one could also argue that it would be
>> a good design, if we adopted it uniformly instead of haphazardly.
>> But that'd require more code churn, and there's no longer a lot to be
>> gained thereby.
>
> I vote for removing pg_foo_fn.h.
+1 on that.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-04-07 12:33:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2018-04-07 12:27:59 | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. (the good and the bad) |