| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Cutting initdb's runtime (Perl question embedded) |
| Date: | 2018-05-10 17:40:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20180510174057.lxvpwbgbbghz2zrm@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-05-10 12:18:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Next question is what to do with this. Do we want to sit on it till
> v12, or sneak it in now?
Is there a decent argument for sneaking it in? I don't really have an
opinion. I don't think it'd really be arguable that this'll make testing
meaningfully faster. OTOH, it's fresh in your mind (which can be said
about a lot of patches obviously).
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-05-10 17:51:27 | Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2018-05-10 17:38:41 | Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? |