| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG 10: could not generate random cancel key |
| Date: | 2018-07-17 17:27:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20180717172748.mh5snsc2gn42qfed@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Jul-17, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > if (RAND_status() == 0)
> > RAND_poll();
>
> Looks like a recipe for an infinite loop. At least, I think we ought
> to have a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in that loop.
What loop?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-07-17 17:30:15 | Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-07-17 17:21:20 | Re: chained transactions |