From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: print_path is missing GatherMerge and CustomScan support |
Date: | 2018-07-19 00:07:22 |
Message-ID: | 20180719000722.GA3411@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:15:25PM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> Yes that's right. Thanks for taking care of it.
Okay, I have pushed a fix for this one as that's wrong and
back-patched to v11. The coverage of reparameterize_path_by_child is
actually quite poor if you look at the reports:
https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c.gcov.html
Could it be possible to stress that more? This way mistakes like this
one could have been avoided from the start.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-07-19 00:19:58 | Re: untrusted PLs should be GRANTable |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-07-18 23:25:37 | Re: Have an encrypted pgpass file |