| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: test_pg_dump missing cleanup actions |
| Date: | 2018-09-27 22:48:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20180927224805.GA1500@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 09:20:15AM -0700, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Attached is a patch with more comments about the intents of the test
> suite, and the separate issue pointed out by Tom fixed. It seems to me
> that actually checking the contents of pg_init_privs would improve the
> reason why the test exists.. I would welcome input about this last
> point.
So, Stephen, any input to offer? This has been around for the last
three weeks. I am tracking this thread in the section for older bugs in
v11 open items.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-09-27 22:49:26 | Re: test_pg_dump missing cleanup actions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-09-27 22:37:57 | Re: Obtaining a more consistent view definition when a UNION subquery contains undecorated constants |