From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add pg_partition_root to get top-most parent of a partition tree |
Date: | 2019-02-08 00:07:57 |
Message-ID: | 20190208000757.GB19742@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 12:11:49PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I looked at it briefly a few weeks ago and it seemed sound, though I
> haven't yet tried to write the constraint display query for psql using
> it, yet -- but that should be straightforward anyway. Let's get it
> committed so we have one less thing to worry about.
item_to_worry_about--;
Thanks for the successive reviews.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-08 00:10:38 | Re: Inconsistent error handling in the openssl init code |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-08 00:04:46 | Re: Tighten up a few overly lax regexes in pg_dump's tap tests |