| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Incorrect comment in be-secure-openssl.c |
| Date: | 2020-05-31 06:54:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20200531065415.GA2008@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:38:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Indeed, looks good to me. I'll go fix, ust let's wait and see first
> if others have any comments.
Actually, I was reading again the new sentence, and did not like its
first part. Here is a rework that looks much better to me:
* Load hardcoded DH parameters.
*
- * To prevent problems if the DH parameter files don't even exist, we
- * can load hardcoded DH parameters supplied with the backend.
+ * If DH parameters cannot be loaded from a specified file, we can load
+ * the hardcoded DH parameters supplied with the backend to prevent
+ * problems.
Daniel, is that fine for you?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Антон Пацев | 2020-05-31 07:43:45 | Proposal: remove string "contains errors; unaffected changes were applied" |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-05-31 02:52:15 | Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility |