From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix |
Date: | 2020-07-23 00:52:14 |
Message-ID: | 20200723005214.GD26630@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:36:05AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> How about we combine both. "Process ID of the parallel group leader, if
> this process is a parallel query worker. NULL if this process is a
> parallel group leader or does not participate in parallel query".
Sounds fine to me. Thanks.
Do others have any objections with this wording?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-07-23 00:59:04 | Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix |
Previous Message | Soumyadeep Chakraborty | 2020-07-23 00:37:28 | Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY |