| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Subject: | Re: Switch to multi-inserts for pg_depend |
| Date: | 2020-08-15 01:50:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20200815015037.GA1803@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 02:23:16PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> It seems a bit silly to worry about allocating just the exact amount
> needed; the current approach looked fine to me.
Okay, thanks.
> The logic to keep track
> number of used slots used is baroque, though -- that could use a lot of
> simplification.
What are you suggesting here? A new API layer to manage a set of
slots?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-08-15 03:19:41 | Re: display offset along with block number in vacuum errors |
| Previous Message | AJG | 2020-08-14 23:14:20 | Re: LSM tree for Postgres |