| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sait Talha Nisanci <Sait(dot)Nisanci(at)microsoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) |
| Date: | 2020-08-27 13:55:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20200827135533.GJ29590@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
* Sait Talha Nisanci (Sait(dot)Nisanci(at)microsoft(dot)com) wrote:
> I have run some benchmarks for this patch. Overall it seems that there is a good improvement with the patch on recovery times:
Maybe I missed it somewhere, but what's the OS/filesystem being used
here..? What's the filesystem block size..?
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-08-27 13:56:47 | Re: Support for OUT parameters in procedures |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2020-08-27 13:51:56 | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach) |