| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Force update_process_title=on in crash recovery? |
| Date: | 2020-09-16 02:30:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20200916023006.GA11110@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:01:18AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Seems like a good argument, but you'd have to be careful about the
> final state when you stop overriding update_process_title --- it can't
> be left looking like it's still-in-progress on some random WAL file.
> (Compare my nearby gripes about walsenders being sloppy about their
> pg_stat_activity and process title presentations.)
Another thing to be careful here is WIN32, see 0921554. And slowing
down recovery is never a good idea.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com | 2020-09-16 02:38:17 | RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-09-16 02:16:35 | Re: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist |