| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Use standard SIGHUP and SIGTERM handlers in autoprewarm module |
| Date: | 2020-10-06 05:53:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20201006055355.GB429@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 11:34:05PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> ISTM that we can also replace StartupProcSigHupHandler() in startup.c
> with SignalHandlerForConfigReload() by making the startup process use
> the general shared latch instead of its own one. POC patch attached.
> Thought?
That looks good to me. Nice cleanup.
> Probably we can also replace sigHupHandler() in syslogger.c with
> SignalHandlerForConfigReload()? This would be separate patch, though.
+1.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2020-10-06 06:11:18 | Re: Use standard SIGHUP and SIGTERM handlers in autoprewarm module |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-10-06 05:50:50 | Re: Use standard SIGHUP and SIGTERM handlers in autoprewarm module |