| From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | jit and explain nontext |
| Date: | 2020-10-14 19:39:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20201014193859.GS9241@telsasoft.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
/* don't print information if no JITing happened */
if (!ji || ji->created_functions == 0)
return;
This applies even when (es->format != EXPLAIN_FORMAT_TEXT), which I think is
wrong. Jit use can be determined by cost, so I think jit details should be
shown in non-text format whenever ji!=NULL, even if it's zeros. Arguably, bits
could be omitted if jit_expressions=off or jit_tuple_deforming=off, but I don't
see the point.
--
Justin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-10-14 19:40:31 | Re: kevent latch paths don't handle postmaster death well |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-10-14 19:36:37 | Re: kevent latch paths don't handle postmaster death well |