| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: error_severity of brin work item |
| Date: | 2020-11-19 18:15:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20201119181521.GA761@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Nov-19, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:11:21PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Your patch didn't actually say "try_relation_open", so didn't work.
> > But it does works if I do that, and close the table.
Thanks for fixing and testing.
> That patch broke the case that a non-index is passed, which I addressed here.
Hmm, I think the reaction to that should be the same as before, so
rather than return 0, the patch should raise the same error that
index_open() would.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergei Kornilov | 2020-11-19 19:17:34 | Re: Improve handling of parameter differences in physical replication |
| Previous Message | Surafel Temesgen | 2020-11-19 18:03:50 | Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table |