| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait) |
| Date: | 2020-11-23 22:10:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20201123221030.GA12311@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Nov-23, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> > Well, we already do this in a number of places. But I can get behind
> > this:
>
> >> Maybe it'd be a good idea to have elog.c expose a new function
> >> along the lines of "bool message_level_is_interesting(int elevel)"
> >> to support this and similar future optimizations in a less fragile way.
>
> I'll see about a patch for that.
Looking at that now ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-11-23 22:15:39 | Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq |
| Previous Message | Anastasia Lubennikova | 2020-11-23 22:08:35 | Re: New default role- 'pg_read_all_data' |