From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: int2vector and btree indexes |
Date: | 2016-10-12 18:55:02 |
Message-ID: | 20856.1476298502@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> On 2016/10/11 21:40, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm ... I kind of wonder why we have int2vectoreq or hashint2vector at
>> all, likewise the hash opclass based on them.
> Agreed. So how about the attached patch to remove the said infrastructure?
Looks good, pushed.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-10-12 18:55:26 | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2016-10-12 18:54:18 | Re: pg_dump getBlobs query broken for 7.3 servers |