| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data |
| Date: | 2018-04-05 20:47:28 |
| Message-ID: | 24760.1522961248@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It seems most of the time the FooRelationId labels are predictable,
> although not as pristine as the Anum_* constants. One possibility that
> came to mind is to treat these like pg_type OID #defines -- have a
> simple rule that can be overridden for historical reasons.
Meh. I'd just as soon avoid having some catalogs done one way and
some another.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-04-05 20:49:03 | Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-04-05 20:46:26 | Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg |