| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Juergen Hannappel <juergen(at)juergen-hannappel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] add option to pg_dumpall to exclude tables from the dump |
| Date: | 2016-08-18 22:01:14 |
| Message-ID: | 27262.1471557674@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> writes:
> On 8/18/16 2:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This seems pretty dubious to me, in particular that the identical -T
>> option will be passed willy-nilly into the pg_dump runs for every
>> database. That seems more likely to be a foot-gun than something useful.
> I agree, but I think mandating a database name (which I suppose could be
> *) with the specifiers would solve that issue.
Hmm, something like "-T dbname1:pattern1 -T dbname2:pattern2" ?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2016-08-18 22:04:10 | Re: [WIP] [B-Tree] Keep indexes sorted by heap physical location |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-08-18 21:44:57 | Re: Curing plpgsql's memory leaks for statement-lifespan values |