| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mai Peng <maily(dot)peng(at)webedia-group(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, maxence(at)bothorel(dot)net |
| Subject: | Re: Segfault logical replication PG 10.4 |
| Date: | 2018-07-18 15:03:52 |
| Message-ID: | 27618.1531926232@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mai Peng <maily(dot)peng(at)webedia-group(dot)com> writes:
> Here the backtrace
Hmm .. so this can be summarized as "logical replication workers should
provide an ActiveSnapshot in case the user functions they call want one".
Makes me wonder how much other transactional infrastructure is needed
but not present.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2018-07-18 15:21:53 | Re: Make foo=null a warning by default. |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-07-18 14:58:16 | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |