From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | boix <boix(at)uclv(dot)cu> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Improving GEQO |
Date: | 2015-05-27 21:36:59 |
Message-ID: | 3323.1432762619@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
boix <boix(at)uclv(dot)cu> writes:
> Hello, my partner and me are working with the goal of improve the GEQO's
> performance, we tried with Ant Colony Optimization, but it does not
> improve, actually we are trying with a new variant of Genetic Algorithm,
> specifically Micro-GA. This algorithm finds a better solution than GEQO
> in less time, however the total query execution time is higher. The
> fitness is calculated by geqo_eval function. Does anybody know why this
> happens?
Well, for one thing, you can't just do this:
+ aux = aux1;
without totally confusing all your subsequent steps.
You'd want to copy the pointed-to data, likely, not the pointer.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2015-05-27 21:45:01 | Re: Run pgindent now? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-05-27 21:19:33 | Re: Run pgindent now? |