From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PoC: Make it possible to disallow WHERE-less UPDATE and DELETE |
Date: | 2016-07-27 01:15:33 |
Message-ID: | 370b84e1-c6eb-4f43-f90d-10f1a7a4d332@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/26/16 6:14 PM, Vik Fearing wrote:
> As mentioned elsewhere in the thread, you can just do WHERE true to get
> around it, so why on Earth have it PGC_SUSET?
I'm not sure whether it's supposed to guard against typos and possibly
buggy SQL string concatenation in application code. So it would help
against accidental mistakes, whereas putting a WHERE TRUE in there would
be an intentional override.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2016-07-27 01:24:28 | Re: PoC: Make it possible to disallow WHERE-less UPDATE and DELETE |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-07-27 01:10:09 | Re: Proposal: revert behavior of IS NULL on row types |