| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Visibility map thoughts |
| Date: | 2007-11-07 18:20:12 |
| Message-ID: | 4731AD7C.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2007 at 8:18 AM, in message <473077AD(dot)30101(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>,
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> The indexam API needs to be modified as well, because there's currently
> no API to return index tuples from an index.
I know this is tangential, but expanding the types of selection
criteria which can be applied to index entries (beyond equality and
range tests) might fall out of this, yes?
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-11-07 18:56:02 | Re: Weird type selection choice |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-07 16:58:49 | Re: Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a / |