| From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates |
| Date: | 2015-03-16 13:22:57 |
| Message-ID: | 5506D931.606@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 16/03/15 00:37, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> On 03/15/2015 09:47 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> It's almost the same thing as you wrote but the 128 bit and 64 bit
>> optimizations are put on the same "level" of optimized routines.
>>
>> But this is nitpicking at this point, I am happy with the patch as it
>> stands right now.
>
> Do you think it is ready for committer?
>
In my opinion, yes.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2015-03-16 13:23:58 | Re: Reduce pinning in btree indexes |
| Previous Message | Воронин Дмитрий | 2015-03-16 13:14:46 | Question about TEMP tables |