From: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | A couple questions about ordered-set aggregates |
Date: | 2020-10-26 01:32:22 |
Message-ID: | 5F962726.7050109@anastigmatix.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I find I am allowed to create an ordered-set aggregate with a non-empty
direct argument list and no finisher function. Am I right in thinking
that's kind of nonsensical, as nothing will ever look at the direct args?
Also, the syntax summary shows PARALLEL = { SAFE | RESTRICTED | UNSAFE }
in the ordered-set syntax variant, since 9.6, though that variant
accepts no combine/serial/deserial functions, and there's also
a note saying "Partial (including parallel) aggregation is currently
not supported for ordered-set aggregates."
Does PARALLEL = { SAFE | RESTRICTED | UNSAFE } on an ordered-set
aggregate affect anything?
Regards,
-Chap
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Smith | 2020-10-26 03:25:49 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-10-26 01:13:15 | Re: [patch] Fix checksum verification in base backups for zero page headers |