| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <jim(dot)nasby(at)openscg(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: objsubid vs subobjid |
| Date: | 2017-03-06 12:30:16 |
| Message-ID: | 5b7c6f27-4131-898f-328f-f2b71cfbe80c@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/5/17 16:10, Jim Nasby wrote:
> BTW, did you backpatch as well? The function was added in 9.5.
> Presumably we wouldn't normally do that, but if we think this is unused
> enough maybe it's worth it.
It's a catalog change, so we can't backpatch it.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-03-06 12:37:58 | Re: pgsql: Allow vacuums to report oldestxmin |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-03-06 12:28:33 | Re: Change in "policy" on dump ordering? |