| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | amborodin(at)acm(dot)org |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: background sessions |
| Date: | 2016-12-14 15:45:09 |
| Message-ID: | 6345a201-c97d-93ab-8bdf-ef787fbd7be6@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/11/16 5:38 AM, Andrew Borodin wrote:
> 2. From my point of view the interface of the feature is the strong
> point here (compared to pg_background). But it does not help
> programmer to follow good practice: bgworker is a valuable and limited
> resource, may be we could start session with something like
> TryBeginSession()?
What exactly would that do?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?= | 2016-12-14 15:58:15 | Re: [PATCH] Add GUCs for predicate lock promotion thresholds |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2016-12-14 15:44:20 | Re: [PATCH] Add GUCs for predicate lock promotion thresholds |