From: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Logical replication existing data copy |
Date: | 2017-02-22 13:48:33 |
Message-ID: | 6df65ee030416533cef97d3e12b1c425@xs4all.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-02-22 13:03, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> 0001-Skip-unnecessary-snapshot-builds.patch
> 0002-Don-t-use-on-disk-snapshots-for-snapshot-export-in-l.patch
> 0003-Fix-xl_running_xacts-usage-in-snapshot-builder.patch
> 0001-Use-asynchronous-connect-API-in-libpqwalreceiver.patch
> 0002-Fix-after-trigger-execution-in-logical-replication.patch
> 0003-Add-RENAME-support-for-PUBLICATIONs-and-SUBSCRIPTION.patch
> 0001-Logical-replication-support-for-initial-data-copy-v5.patch
It works well now, or at least my particular test case seems now solved.
thanks,
Erik Rijkers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-02-22 13:56:29 | Re: mat views stats |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-02-22 13:43:28 | Re: Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster |