From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take two |
Date: | 2018-03-03 14:12:27 |
Message-ID: | 7d040dbb-33f3-edb7-b13d-0f4ab607af46@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/26/18 03:00, Michael Paquier wrote:
> As promised on a recent thread, here is a second tentative to switch
> pg_upgrade's test.sh into a TAP infrastructure.
AFAICT, this still has the same problem as the previous take, namely
that adding a TAP test suite to the pg_upgrade subdirectory will end up
with the build farm client running the pg_upgrade tests twice. What we
likely need here is an update to the build farm client in conjunction
with this.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-03-03 14:30:02 | Re: [HACKERS] GSOC'17 project introduction: Parallel COPY execution with errors handling |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-03-03 14:02:23 | Re: [HACKERS] GSOC'17 project introduction: Parallel COPY execution with errors handling |